In addition, the court reduced the agency’s power, commonly known as the “big questions” principle – which would affect the federal government’s power to regulate other areas of climate policy, as well as the Internet and worker controls. Security.
Judgment was given as 6-3. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion for the Conservative majority, while the three Liberal judges disagreed. R.“The law empowers it to create carbon emissions limits based on a generational shift approach,” Oberts said, adding that “our forerunner casts doubt on the EPA’s claim.”
“Under our precedents, this is a big question case,” Roberts wrote.
Roberts wrote that controlling carbon dioxide emissions to a level that would force a nationwide shift from coal use could be a “sensible” solution.
“But it is not credible that Congress has given the EPA the power to adopt such a regulatory plan on its own.”
“The outcome of such scales and consequences rests with Congress, or an agency acting on the clear delegation of that representative body,” he wrote.
This story is going to be broken and updated.